<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rocking Yukon Gold mp3, sheet music, midi, Garageband project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soupgreens.com/2009/06/06/rocking-yukon-gold-mp3-sheet-music-midi-garageband-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soupgreens.com/2009/06/06/rocking-yukon-gold-mp3-sheet-music-midi-garageband-project/</link>
	<description>olden days music and arcane americana by Lucas Gonze</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Fienberg</title>
		<link>http://soupgreens.com/2009/06/06/rocking-yukon-gold-mp3-sheet-music-midi-garageband-project/comment-page-1/#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Fienberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soupgreens.com/?p=266#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>Yeah, what I really want to say about your music, I want to say *with* music, not with words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, what I really want to say about your music, I want to say *with* music, not with words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gonze</title>
		<link>http://soupgreens.com/2009/06/06/rocking-yukon-gold-mp3-sheet-music-midi-garageband-project/comment-page-1/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gonze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soupgreens.com/?p=266#comment-3263</guid>
		<description>Jay, do you find that you have to test your output?  That&#039;s harsh.

My main recording tool is Audacity, which works for me because I do one-track live acoustic recordings.  It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if Audacity were considered a reference encoder, just because of its origins in free culture.

Thanks for the MP3 link bug report.  I&#039;ll fix it pronto.

Funny that it&#039;s so much easier to talk about the technology and techniques than the music...  Anyhow, glad that it speaks to you.  

Personally I really like how the three textures/tracks work together.  The chunky rhythmic guitar vs the airy whistling, with the metallic bottleneck poking out of the mix in unpredictable places.  The way they work together so nicely without having to be exactly in sync is because they were all playing along with a MIDI piano part which isn&#039;t in the mix.  It was like a skeleton for a sculpture.  Also, the whistling sits in the background glues the rhythm guitar and bottleneck together, like corn starch.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, do you find that you have to test your output?  That&#8217;s harsh.</p>
<p>My main recording tool is Audacity, which works for me because I do one-track live acoustic recordings.  It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if Audacity were considered a reference encoder, just because of its origins in free culture.</p>
<p>Thanks for the MP3 link bug report.  I&#8217;ll fix it pronto.</p>
<p>Funny that it&#8217;s so much easier to talk about the technology and techniques than the music&#8230;  Anyhow, glad that it speaks to you.  </p>
<p>Personally I really like how the three textures/tracks work together.  The chunky rhythmic guitar vs the airy whistling, with the metallic bottleneck poking out of the mix in unpredictable places.  The way they work together so nicely without having to be exactly in sync is because they were all playing along with a MIDI piano part which isn&#8217;t in the mix.  It was like a skeleton for a sculpture.  Also, the whistling sits in the background glues the rhythm guitar and bottleneck together, like corn starch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Fienberg</title>
		<link>http://soupgreens.com/2009/06/06/rocking-yukon-gold-mp3-sheet-music-midi-garageband-project/comment-page-1/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Fienberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 03:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soupgreens.com/?p=266#comment-3262</guid>
		<description>Really like that, Lucas! Very nice.

Note: your link labeled &quot;mp3&quot; above is to the aiff file.

Relative to Ogg and Flac, one of the issue I&#039;m having with those formats is a lack of confidence that the files I might produce will be totally correct in different players. Flac seems way better than Ogg in this respect, but (maybe I am wrong about this) there isn&#039;t any kind of reference encoder / player that everyone considers pretty standard. 

Anyway, that&#039;s a long winded way of saying that I haven&#039;t found a reliable way to use those formats in my file distribution process. I output those formats, but then they sit while I feel like I need to test every file on every player I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really like that, Lucas! Very nice.</p>
<p>Note: your link labeled &#8220;mp3&#8243; above is to the aiff file.</p>
<p>Relative to Ogg and Flac, one of the issue I&#8217;m having with those formats is a lack of confidence that the files I might produce will be totally correct in different players. Flac seems way better than Ogg in this respect, but (maybe I am wrong about this) there isn&#8217;t any kind of reference encoder / player that everyone considers pretty standard. </p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s a long winded way of saying that I haven&#8217;t found a reliable way to use those formats in my file distribution process. I output those formats, but then they sit while I feel like I need to test every file on every player I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

